<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ShootQ vs. Tave &#8211; A Review of two studio management systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A review of 3 photo studio management software systems. &#124; GCB</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>A review of 3 photo studio management software systems. &#124; GCB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>[...] Photographer HOT-ONE 2010 this year. I did some research on Google and found a good post from Scott McNamara who compares ShootQ and Tàve. These last two systems are online and you don&#8217;t have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photographer HOT-ONE 2010 this year. I did some research on Google and found a good post from Scott McNamara who compares ShootQ and Tàve. These last two systems are online and you don&#8217;t have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>The first REAL review that I have read. You have taken time and researched a great deal. Love the idea of having a place to inter serials from equipment! I hear that Tave is offering even more at WPPI as far as upgrades. I love pretty, but your right - I love that it flows and works better. Maybe we will see some slick interface soon? Cheers, Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first REAL review that I have read. You have taken time and researched a great deal. Love the idea of having a place to inter serials from equipment! I hear that Tave is offering even more at WPPI as far as upgrades. I love pretty, but your right &#8211; I love that it flows and works better. Maybe we will see some slick interface soon? Cheers, Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunlit Images</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunlit Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to write this!  I&#039;m trying to decide between the two and this gave so much more detail than either website does, without using the trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to write this!  I&#39;m trying to decide between the two and this gave so much more detail than either website does, without using the trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>nice job - very thorough! i appreciate it big time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice job &#8211; very thorough! i appreciate it big time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwabena</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>kwabena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Just when I had made up my mind with the help of your good review, Christine comments on ShootQ correcting some of the problems. In any case ... very good review/info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I had made up my mind with the help of your good review, Christine comments on ShootQ correcting some of the problems. In any case &#8230; very good review/info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>By the way -- several of the items in your post have been addressed. iPhone integration launched on Monday, several of the items now work ... just thought I would share!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way &#8212; several of the items in your post have been addressed. iPhone integration launched on Monday, several of the items now work &#8230; just thought I would share!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.scottmphotoblog.com/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://96.30.18.20/~scottmph/2009/02/shootq-vs-tave-a-review-of-two-studio-management-systems-2/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>ShootQ has limits to customization because the plan for the future is to tie in to things like Quickbooks; in order to allow for this, the data is kept pretty clean.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;HOWEVER, there are some *big* things coming soon that address several items you list.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The ability for clients to see files has been a constant request, and one that I know ShootQ has on their radar to address.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And I&#039;m not sure what automated emails you&#039;re talking about -- the only things that go out automatically for me are the invoices. I like it that way, because I don&#039;t like being the bad cop.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve had a lot of great interaction with the ShootQ team, including the owners of the company. I&#039;ve also had a wonderful experience using ShootQ. I should point out that I haven&#039;t used Tave, and it sounds like you have been really happy with it. It is all about finding the perfect fit for what you need!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ShootQ has limits to customization because the plan for the future is to tie in to things like Quickbooks; in order to allow for this, the data is kept pretty clean.</p>
<p>HOWEVER, there are some *big* things coming soon that address several items you list.</p>
<p>The ability for clients to see files has been a constant request, and one that I know ShootQ has on their radar to address.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sure what automated emails you&#8217;re talking about &#8212; the only things that go out automatically for me are the invoices. I like it that way, because I don&#8217;t like being the bad cop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a lot of great interaction with the ShootQ team, including the owners of the company. I&#8217;ve also had a wonderful experience using ShootQ. I should point out that I haven&#8217;t used Tave, and it sounds like you have been really happy with it. It is all about finding the perfect fit for what you need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

